Lestari, Fetri Novita Indah (2025) ARGUMENTATIVE STRATEGY IN DISCUSSION SECTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION OF MUHAMMADIYAH AND AISYIYAH JOURNALS IN INDONESIA. Skripsi (Bachelor) thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu.
|
Text (Fulltext)
FETRI NOVITA INDAH LESTARI_2188203034_Full Text_compressed.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (4MB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text (Turnitin)
FETRI NOVITA INDAH LESTARI_2188203034_TURNITIN.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (7MB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text (Abstrak + BAB 1)
FETRI NOVITA INDAH LESTARI_2188203034_ABSTRAK+BAB 1.pdf - Submitted Version Download (924kB) |
|
|
Text (BAB 2)
FETRI NOVITA INDAH LESTARI_2188203034_BAB 2.pdf - Submitted Version Download (320kB) |
|
|
Text (BAB 3)
FETRI NOVITA INDAH LESTARI_2188203034_BAB 3.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (343kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text (BAB 4)
FETRI NOVITA INDAH LESTARI_2188203034_BAB 4.pdf - Submitted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (430kB) | Request a copy |
|
|
Text (BAB 5)
FETRI NOVITA INDAH LESTARI_ 2188203034_BAB 5.pdf - Submitted Version Download (198kB) |
|
|
Text (Ref + Lamp)
FETRI NOVITA INDAH LESTARI_2188203034_REFERENSI+LAMPIRAN_compressed.pdf - Submitted Version Download (4MB) |
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the argumentative strategies used in the discussion section of journal articles published by Muhammadiyah and 'Aisyiyah Universities in Indonesia. This study is important because the discussion section is a scientific space that requires authors to convey their findings through logical and reflective reasoning. The issues addressed in this study include the types of argumentative strategies employed by authors and how these strategies are applied based on the Toulmin model. The data consists of quotations from the discussion sections of journal articles that contain elements of argumentative strategies. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected from 61 SINTA 2–indexed journal articles published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta (UMY), Universitas Ahmad Dahlan (UAD), and Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo (UMSIDA). Data were gathered through document analysis, using a checklist to identify Toulmin model components Claim, Grounds, Warrant, Backing, Qualifier, and Rebuttal. The results indicate that Claim, Grounds, and Backing appeared in all articles (100%), while Warrant, Qualifier, and Rebuttal were applied inconsistently. In total, 33 articles (54%) demonstrated a complete set of argumentative components. These results suggest that integrating reflective reasoning and adopting the Toulmin model explicitly in academic wri
| Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi (Bachelor)) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Pembimbing: Dr. Dian Susyla, M.Pd |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Keywords: Argumentative Strategy, Discussion Section, Toulmin Model, Discourse Analysis, Academic Writing |
| Subjects: | Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu > 07-Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > 88203-(S1) Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris 07-Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > 88203-(S1) Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris |
| Divisions: | 07-Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > 88203-(S1) Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Subjek Terkait > 07-Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan > 88203-(S1) Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris |
| Depositing User: | Mrs Atika Ledia Anggraini |
| Date Deposited: | 22 May 2026 02:27 |
| Last Modified: | 22 May 2026 02:27 |
| URI: | http://repository.umb.ac.id/id/eprint/2306 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |

